Avoiding Fraud Thru Background Checks

February 27, 2009 · Filed Under Negotiation · Comment 

It may seem easy to become a victim of fraud, but you’ll be surprise to know that it’s as easy as well to avoid it. All you have to do to defend yourself from the abundant number of fraudulent practices is to do your homework about it. The task of preventing yourself from being scammed can be easy; especially if you let someone else do the studying for you. This is so not like school where you have to be strict with who should do the process or what. With the help of professionals, you’re guaranteed assurance on what you’re about to get yourself into. Prior to doing business transactions with a company, or before entering an employment relationship, you can ask a third party company that’s specializes in background checks to do a comprehensive background check for you.

Identity verification and background searches are among the best tools there is that could help you in making sure you’ll make the right decision in the end. The lack of professional credentials that everyone often ignores is among the common reasons for someone to fall victim to fraud. Doing business transactions blindly, without the slightest idea as to whom you’re dealing with, can cause significant harm to you, your own business and even to your family. Settling to what type of background check tool you should choose is the next step that you should consider. To do that you would have to know what kind of business or transaction it is that you are planning to work on. For a contractual agreement, a due diligence check is what you should do. This due diligence check that we speak about is actually a kind of comprehensive background check used to verify the qualifications of the company or the executive that you wish to consider entering or doing business with. The results include state databases pertaining to the professional licensing and registration of the company being questioned.

Read more

Peace Negotiation Process in Sudan

December 20, 2008 · Filed Under Negotiation · Comment 

Sudan seems to be an independent country, however under strong influence of different ethnic and religious conflicts it is torn among different ethnic and religious groups. To certain extend we could compare situation in Sudan to the political situation in India before Rajiv Gandhi.

There was a leader needed who was able to show to all of different fighting groups for the local independence a common aim to achieve, global independence of the whole country. All of those people had to learn how to respect other groups, their tradition and religion. There is no possibility of uniting the nation without common understanding among all of the groups fighting for freedom.

Someone could say that the political situation in Sudan is stable apart form the civil war going on in the south of Sudan, between government forces and Christian separatist. Hence is we perceive a country as one organism then we have to admit that the country is the state of war for about fifty years.

Read more

Civil Society and Corruption in East Africa

December 20, 2008 · Filed Under Negotiation · Comment 

AUTHOR: ANGUALIA DANIEL
CIVIL SOCIETY AND CORRUPTION IN EAST AFRICA

ABSTRACT

Corruption is a big problem in Africa. International reports by World Bank and National reports by member states have revealed that colossal sum of money is lost to corruption. This has impeded the achievement of the Millennium development goals and other national development objectives of the respective states.

Civil society organizations of national, regional and international character as well as organizations such as International Monetary Fund, African Union, Africa Development Bank and World Bank have raised concern over increased corruption in the region.

This is despite the legal and institutional frameworks put in place by the African states as a move against corruption in Africa.

The reasons for the increased corruption in Africa can be linked to political, social, economic and legal factors.

This paper gives a case study of East Africa. It will analyze the state of corruption in East Africa and the role played by civil society in the fight against corruption. East Africa comprises of Uganda Kenya and Tanzania.

Read more

Make Them an Offer They Must Refuse

December 20, 2008 · Filed Under Negotiation · Comment 

In the KARRASS Effective Negotiating® Seminar we talk about how you might utilize the “Bogey” as a discovery tactic to gain more information. The more you know about what’s on the other party’s “sheet,” the more opportunities you have to find ways to create a Both-Win agreement.

There may be times when you should “make them a offer they must refuse.”

Why should anyone give the other party such an offer? There are lots of reasons.

Such proposals help set the stage for making offers later that look good by comparison (i.e. help establish aspiration levels). These types of negotiation offers can serve to give you time to think things through. They can tie up the negotiation, force talks to break down, or help postpone decisions. All of these events may provide you more time which you can use to create a better agreement.

Read more

Recruiting: Setting the Best Fee

December 20, 2008 · Filed Under Negotiation · Comment 

I prefer to discuss my contingency fee for delivering a great candidate when I’ve located the Decision Maker and am about two-thirds of the way through completing a job order form. My client has done 90% of the talking up until this point and provided the exact information I need before deciding what my fee will be for this search.

While my client has been talking I’ve been listening closely and taking notes.

The beauty of working as a Recruiter lies in our ability to design how we choose to work. I’m happy to explain how I determine my fee but respect the fact there are dozens of ways to set a fee. Find what works best for you by experimenting. Don’t charge a fee you would not pay.

Many recruiters adhere to setting their fee based on the traditional mindset of a percentage of a candidate’s first years’ salary, say 25%. I’ve always felt that ‘one size fits all’ mentality was limiting. Personally, I set my fee after considering a number of factors. Sometimes I’ve been high and sometimes I’ve been low. Oh well. I don’t care because I make placements consistently and my open-mindedness keeps my clients loyal and attracts new clients like bears to honey.

Read more

Resin Figure

December 20, 2008 · Filed Under Negotiation · Comment 

Tag:Resin Figure,china toys,20 years experience
From:http://www.buy-china-toys.com/

Item name: RF 02
Design: Custom
Color: Pantone
MOQ: 1, 000pcs
Package: Custom design acceptable
Lead time: 30-45 days after approval
Resin Figure
With more than 20 years experience in Stationery field, we, Bokey Industries Company, specialize in manufacturing and exporting stationery & gifts products. Our product range includes Stationery, Stained Glasswares, Ceramic items, Housewares, Holiday items, Occasion gifts, LED lights… Etc. Which is expanding to cater for the needs of our Customers. We supply not only traditional stationery & stained glass products, but also new products design, drawing and samples making. We also have plenty of sources for household items & light-industrial products. Raw material we handled covers plastic, wood, metal, ceramic polyresin, glass and fabric.
Contact Person: Mr. Ricky Leung Company: Bokey Industries Company Address: Room A,5/F, Shing Lee Comm Building,6-12 Wing Kut Street, Central, Hong Kong Telephone: 852–24900210 Mobile: 98139224

Read more

Why You Should Have It In Writing

December 20, 2008 · Filed Under Negotiation · Comment 

There is an old saying in the West that says that if the preacher talks too much about stealing, better sneak out a little early, race home and lock the cellar!

The same holds for the good old boy that says, Ah, we don’t need to have a contract. You can trust me. The most innocent reasons for putting something in writing are that frankly each of us forgets, changes our minds or some folk just plain lie!

Robert Ringer famously said in the 70’s, If you have it in writing, you have a prayer. If you don’t have it in writing you just have air! Sadly, old Bobby was right more times than wrong.

A Contract is a meeting of the minds. When two people finally have that, it means that they think the same thing, or at least at that moment in time they think that they think the same thought! So a good thought is to write that good thought down in black and white so both parties can look at it. When you both see it in those bold letters and it is really what you both were thinking, then you really do have a contract. The final touch is when each of you put your John Hancock’s on the dotted line.

Read more

How can a Company Manage its Image using Public Relations

December 20, 2008 · Filed Under Negotiation · Comment 

Public relations is no longer something that just happens; how a company or corporation is perceived in the public eye, particularly in the eye of the company’s shareholders or potential customers, isn’t something that’s left to chance. Companies have entire departments and large budgets in place to ensure that they will be viewed in a positive light by the public.

In its simplest form, the idea of public relations is to get the word out to the public concerning all of the positive things that a company or organization may be involved in, and to enhance the company’s overall image, while at the same time downplaying anything that could potential be viewed as a negative action in the public eye.

Public relations is kind of like advertising’s less obtrusive brother. Where advertising’s main goal is to stick a product in the face of a potential customer and give them every reason to buy it, the public relations approach is a lot less direct.

Read more

Leveraging Collective Buying of Residential Apartments

December 20, 2008 · Filed Under Negotiation · Comment 

DO HOME-BUYERS ACTUALLY LEVERAGE THIER COLLECTIVE BUYING ABILITY?

Let me make this outrageous statement at the beginning of this post – “Most…… (Please note that I am not generalizing) Most consumers or retail investors in the residential realty segment don’t have an idea on what they look for, what they are bargaining for and what exactly to expect. They pretend to be experts with their source of knowledge or expertise being another one of them”.

I will explain the above. Give me some time to draw an analogy. These very consumers, when they go out to buy cars, they don’t pretend to know much more than the car manufacturer. When these very clients visit a doctor, they don’t try to throw their limited acquired knowledge on the domain of medicine at the specialist. Likewise, when it comes to real estate, we have more pretending specialists than real ones, ON BOTH SIDES OF THE TABLE.

As a member of the Trustbanq Realty business group, I have had the opportunity to meet a few client groups, who wanted to go out and source investment opportunities for themselves. Some small groups, some larger. If I have to fix up a percentage to such deals fructifying, I am afraid that it won’t be more than 5%…. just five percent? WHY?

In the first place, these groups attempt to source, compare, negotiate and close the deal, all by them. THEY DO NOT HAVE AN OUTSIDE EXPERT AGENCY TO HANDLE THE ASSIGNMENT. I would deal with the handicaps and threats of this approach, ahead on the article.

Read more

How Do You Respond to a “take it or Leave It” Demand?

December 20, 2008 · Filed Under Negotiation · Comment 

What do you do when the other party gives you a firm but polite “take-it-or-leave-it”? There are options available. My advice is to test it hard—their position may not be as firm as it looks.

The best approach to testing a “take-it-or-leave-it” is to change the nature of the deal. Broaden the project or reduce its size; change the quantities (more – less); modify the quality levels; more or fewer services; extended or shorter delivery periods.

If you are working on a package deal think about modifying the product mix to include new items or spare parts or training. Mix items that are not “take-it-or-leave-it” with those that are. Then negotiate the agreement.

In addition, you might want to try any of the following negotiating countermeasures to test the firmness of the other person’s “take-it-or-leave- it” position:

1. Agree that it appears you are at a negotiating impasse, and walk out. (Don’t forget to plan your walking back in strategy.)

Read more

Next Page »